ASIA IDDI v REPUBLIC 1989 TLR 174

Facts
The appellant was convicted on the strength of a co-accused's confession together with independent testimony of witnesses who were in one way or another involved in the transaction. On appeal. 
Held: (i) Conviction cannot be based solely on a confession by a co-accused. There B must be, in addition, other independent testimony to corroborate it.(ii) evidence of a person who has an interest to serve also needs corroboration as such it cannot be used to corroborate other evidence.
Obiter: The purposes of reading over a charge sheet to the accused are, inter alia, to allow the magistrate an opportunity to correct any errors apparent on the charge sheet lest they embarrass the accused person. 

No comments:

Post a Comment